2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2012 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2012 Nissan Navara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan Navara has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan Navara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Rezzo | 2012 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Rezzo | Navara |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |