2003 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2003 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (90 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu Charade | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Charade | CU-X |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 989 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |