2003 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (90 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. 2003 Daihatsu Charade has automatic transmission and 2011 Audi R8 has manual transmission. 2011 Audi R8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Daihatsu Charade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Daihatsu Charade | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Audi |
| Model | Charade | R8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 989 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.3 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 90 L |
