2003 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu Charade.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu Charade. (91 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Daihatsu Charade | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
| Model | Charade | Micra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 989 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 46 L |
