2003 Daihatsu Copen vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu Copen. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu Copen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 80 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu Copen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu Copen, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu Copen. (120 Nm). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu Copen | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Copen | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2210 mm |