2003 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daihatsu Naked (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu Naked should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 114 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu Naked.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu Naked | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
Model | Naked | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |