2003 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu Naked | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Daihatsu | SsangYong |
Model | Naked | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2970 mm |