2003 Daihatsu YRV vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu YRV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu YRV would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 822 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu YRV.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu YRV | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | YRV | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.7 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |