2003 Daihatsu YRV vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu YRV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu YRV would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daihatsu YRV (127 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daihatsu YRV (170 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2003 Daihatsu YRV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu YRV | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Daihatsu | Toyota |
Model | YRV | Matrix |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |