2003 Daihatsu YRV vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daihatsu YRV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daihatsu YRV would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daihatsu YRV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daihatsu YRV (85 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2003 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (190 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu YRV.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daihatsu YRV | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Chevrolet |
Model | YRV | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 190 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 46 L |