2003 Dodge Caravan vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Dodge Caravan is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Caravan (146 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 980 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Caravan (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Caravan | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Caravan | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2160 mm |