2003 Dodge Dakota vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2003 Dodge Dakota is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 56 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Because 2003 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Dodge Dakota 2000 Ford Mustang
Make Dodge Ford
Model Dakota Mustang
Year Released 2003 2000
Body Type Pickup Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2458 cc 4603 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 118 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 196 Nm 406 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1536 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2580 mm