2003 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2003 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Dakota | Commodore |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |