2003 Dodge Durango vs. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Dodge Durango is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Durango weights approximately 635 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2003 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Durango | 1982 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Durango | E |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4702 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2800 mm |