2003 Dodge Durango vs. 1996 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2003 Dodge Durango is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Durango (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Durango weights approximately 880 kg more than 1996 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Durango (399 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Celica. 2003 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 1996 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1996 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: