2003 Dodge Durango vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Durango (232 HP) has 164 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2003 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Durango | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Durango | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4702 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2360 mm |
