2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Kahuna | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Kahuna | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1960 mm |
