2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Kahuna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Kahuna | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Kahuna | 12 M |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |