2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 1966 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Kahuna. (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Kahuna.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Kahuna. (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Kahuna.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Kahuna | 1966 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Kahuna | MK X |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |