2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 1983 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Because 1983 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Mustang. (278 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Kahuna | 1983 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Kahuna | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
