2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Kahuna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Kahuna would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Kahuna | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
| Model | Kahuna | Epica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
