2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Neon | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |