2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 587 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Neon | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | Herald |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
