2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1964 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (152 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Neon | 1964 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Neon | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2420 mm |
