2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 177 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Neon | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |