2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1965 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Because 1965 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1965 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Cortina |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.3 mm | 58.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1857 kg | 835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |