2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Neon | Fronte |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2250 mm |