2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1968 Ford 17
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 291 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Neon | 1968 Ford 17 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Neon | 17 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.4 mm | 70.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |
