2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 637 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (85 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Neon | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Neon | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.4 mm | 61 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |
