2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1972 Ford Torino
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Torino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Torino would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Torino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1972 Ford Torino. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Torino.
Because 1972 Ford Torino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Torino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Torino (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Torino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1972 Ford Torino | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Torino |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3000 mm |