2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Neon | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |