2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Opel Manta

To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Manta would be higher. At 1,979 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Opel Manta. (110 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Manta.

Because 1982 Opel Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Manta (161 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Neon.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Dodge Neon 1982 Opel Manta
Make Dodge Opel
Model Neon Manta
Year Released 2003 1982
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1979 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 114 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 152 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 3400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2600 mm