2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Zastava 132

To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 249 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: