2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 780. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 780 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Volvo 780 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Volvo 780 (127 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Because 1985 Volvo 780 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Volvo 780. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Volvo 780 (250 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1985 Volvo 780 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Neon | 780 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2780 mm |