2003 Dodge Neon vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 929 weights approximately 278 kg more than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929. 1986 Mazda 929 has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Mazda 929 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Neon | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Neon | 929 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 259 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2720 mm |
