2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2001 Proton 300
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2001 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2001 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 309 kg more than 2001 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 2001 Proton 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Proton |
Model | Neon | 300 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2450 mm |