2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 24 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1323 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 80 L |