2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 603 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: