2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2006 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 892 kg more than 2006 Smart Roadster.
Because 2006 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 2006 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Dodge | Smart |
Model | Neon | Roadster |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.3 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1857 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2370 mm |