2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 7 kg more than 2010 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1857 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2824 mm |