2003 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Neon. 2012 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Neon | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Neon | C70 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2639 mm |