2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 476 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1469 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Dodge | Saab |
Model | Ram | 92 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |