2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Dodge | Saab |
Model | Ram | 92 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2480 mm |