2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1959 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 462 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1829 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1959 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Seven |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2240 mm |
