2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1960 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1960 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Elite |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1214 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2240 mm |
