2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Dodge | Morgan |
| Model | Ram | 4 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |
