2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 426 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1259 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 588 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Ram | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
