2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | Fronte |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 81 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 66 L |