2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1570 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Ram | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2060 mm |
