2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP) has 447 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1294 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 639 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Ram | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |
